Septiembre 27, 2004Promesas que cumplir![]() Vía Larry Lessig, nos enteramos de que el libro de su colega William Fisher, Promises to Keep, ha llegado ya a las librerías... y a la red, aunque solamente es posible descargarse la "Introducción" y el capítulo donde propone un sistema de compensaciones para los artistas. De ahí citamos lo que sigue: Specifically, this chapter proposes that we replace major portions of the copyright and encryption-reinforcement models with a variant of the third strategy--a governmentally administered reward system. In brief, here's how such a system would work. A creator who wished to collect revenue when his or her song or film was heard or watched would register it with the Copyright Office. With registration would come a unique file name, which would be used to track transmissions of digital copies of the work. The government would raise, through taxes, sufficient money to compensate registrants for making their works available to the public. Using techniques pioneered by American and European performing rights organizations and television rating services, a government agency would estimate the frequency with which each song and film was heard or watched by consumers. Each registrant would then periodically be paid by the agency a share of the tax revenues proportional to the relative popularity of his or her creation. Once this system were in place, we would modify copyright law to eliminate most of the current prohibitions on unauthorized reproduction, distribution, adaptation, and performance of audio and video recordings. Music and films would thus be readily available, legally, for free. Painting with a very broad brush (details will come later), here would be the advantages of such a system. Consumers would pay less for more entertainment. Artists would be fairly compensated. The set of artists who made their creations available to the world at large--and consequently the range of entertainment products available to consumers--would increase. Musicians would be less dependent on record companies, and filmmakers would be less dependent on studios, for the distribution of their creations. Both consumers and artists would enjoy greater freedom to modify and redistribute audio and video recordings. Although the prices of consumer electronic equipment and broadband access would increase somewhat, demand for them would rise, thus benefiting the suppliers of those goods and services. Finally, society at large would benefit from a sharp reduction in litigation and other transaction costs. The ensuing sections of this chapter describe this system in more detail and explore its merits and demerits. A ver si a lo largo del día encuentro diez minutos y lo traduzco. El quinto ElasticoComentarios
|
Más Proyectos Elásticos ![]() Especiales y Agenda
Categorías
Arquitectura
Ars Electronica Ars Electronica 2004 Arte ArtFutura 2003 ArtFutura 2004 ArtFutura 2005 Blogs Copyright Elástico Network Entrevistas Erotica Festivales/Call for papers Freakshow Gadgets Galerias La Petite Claudine Letras Move your MP3s Periodismo Politech Publicidad Realidad Aumentada RSS Scans Semántica Sintetizadores Tiempo Real Trailer Park Videoclips/Digital Film Videojuegos
Archivos
Enero 2006
Diciembre 2005 Noviembre 2005 Octubre 2005 Septiembre 2005 Agosto 2005 Julio 2005 Junio 2005 Mayo 2005 Abril 2005 Marzo 2005 Febrero 2005 Enero 2005 Diciembre 2004 Noviembre 2004 Octubre 2004 Septiembre 2004 Agosto 2004 Julio 2004 Junio 2004 Mayo 2004 Abril 2004 Marzo 2004 Febrero 2004 Enero 2004 Diciembre 2003 Noviembre 2003 Octubre 2003 Mayo 2003 |